Wake up to the The Hindu – Times of India Ad War

Hearing the name of Hindu news paper evokes respect and brings to our mind the picture of a grand old man sharing wisdom in its grammatical best. ‘Thou shall read the Hindu Editorial” was the first commandment of the English teacher at school, which had to be religiously followed.  Of late the grand old man was facing a series of challenges in his own bastion Chennai from the young and handsome Times of India. The doomsayers predicted The Hindu to die a natural death. But the grand old man struck back taking Times of India to the cleaners.


It all began with the Times of India’s Chennai specific ad that called on the Chennaites to shun the news paper (The Hindu) that puts them to sleep and ‘wake up’ to times of India

   

                               

The grand old Hindu was struck by the innovative advertising tactics of the young Times of India. But they say wisdom outsmarts knowledge. What followed was a series of advertisements from The Hindu doing irreparable damage to the Times of India with the tag line ‘Stay ahead of Times’!. If ToI ad was chennai specific, the Hindu ad went beyond the boundaries and has an all India effect. This is how The Hindu retaliated:

Followed By:

Then came:

The Print ads too were sharp and specific:

FAKED MOON LANDING

FAKED MOON LANDINGS!

(This is Mr. Overstreet talking now:)

My conspiracy theory for this report is that we never went to the moon. The whole dang thing was faked. When I had first heard of this idea, I though [sic] to my self that it was a load of rubbish. "Of course we went to the moon" Kept going through my mind.I had first heard of this Idea from a local Radio Talk Show, Ground Zero, which plays every Sunday night on KBER 101.1 They had brought up some interesting points, but I was not quite sure that I believed them, so I have taken this opportunity to study this Idea further. I am now convinced that we never landed on the moon, and it is my hope, that I can make you question it yourself.

One thing that I would like to call to attention, is that I am not an expert on anything that is written in this report. I don't know much about camera's, or non-atmospheric conditions, or physics or anything.

 I am just a senior in high school, and about the only thing that I know professionally is how to run movie projectors. I challenge all that read this page to find something wrong with it, and tell me about it, so I can more accurately disprove one of the most historical events of the century..... The Landing on the Moon.

"I challenge all that read this page to find something wrong with it, and tell me about it, so I can more accurately disprove (emphasis mine) one of the most historical events of the century...."

Lets Start off with the pictures

Lets face it, there isn't really a heapload of evidence that we didn't go to the moon. Why would there be? NASA doesn't WANT evidence that we went to the moon. NASA wants people not to ask questions, and keep living their happy little lives. But here is some evidence that you cannot argue with.

My theory is that the moon landing were [sic] set on a sound stage, not in space. (Perhaps an Air Force base near San Bernardino, called Norton Air Force Base, where they have the world's largest sound stages under tremendously efficient security).

On the moon, there is only one light source, the sun. This is a shot of Buzz Aldrin and Neal [sic] Armstrong planting the US flag on the moon. If the sun is the only light source used by NASA on the moon, Aldrins shadow A shadows [sic] should not be so much longer than Armstrong's

This is a famous picture labeled "Man on the Moon" I have a poster of this picture hanging on my wall in my room, and it always gives me a chuckle.If you will look at area B you will notice a shadow cast across Buzz Aldrin's space suit. Once again, if the Sun is the only light source used on the moon, this shadow would have been MUCH darker.

Looking at area C you will notice that the surface of the moon fades off into the distance, then is met with the moon's horizon. In a no-atmosphere environment, the ground shouldn't have faded out, but stayed crystal sharp unto the moon's horizo

Looking at area D you can plainly see some type of structure reflected through Aldrins helmet. I do not know what it i

 

In this picture, taken from the LEM, you can see at least two abnormalities. In section E you see an abnormal shadow on the moon's surface. NASA claims that this shadow is the shadow cast by the Lunar Module, but on earth, even when aircraft is flying low to the ground, it does not produce such a clearly defined shadow. 

OK, here's the kicker... if you will look at section 3 you will notice there are no stars in the sky. In fact, you will never see any stars in any NASA Moon photographs, or hear an astronaut mention anything about the glorious stars that are visible when out of the earths atmosphere.

This is a picture of Alan Bean holding up a Special Environmental Examiner Container [sic]. This picture was taken off a camera that was strapped to Conrad's chest. If the camera was attached to Conrad's chest, the top of Bean's helmet L should not be in this picture. 

All of the shadows reflected in Bean's visor M are going off in separate directions, not in parallel lines like they should be.

If you will look at the Environmental sampler that Al Bean is holding, N, The reflection is coming from a light source other than the sun, but it is possible that light is being reflected off the space suit.
There is a strange anomaly in the sky 7, It is [sic] yet to be determined what that might be.

In our last picture, I would like to direct your attention to the circled portion of the screen. These Lunar Rover tracks are quite well defined, don't you agree? Well, the fact is, you need a mixture of a compound, and water, to make such defined lines. I don't know if that idea is so convincing, but I assure you, this next one is

If you look at the rock labeled R you will notice a the letter C carved in the rock. Perhaps a gag left by the props department?

Here is a portion of the previous picture, blown up. Take a look at the cross hairs that appear on the picture. These hairs appear on EVERY lunar picture. These cross hairs are placed between the shutter of the camera, and the film, supposedly. If you take a look at the cross hair on the left, this cross hair was placed behind the lunar rover, you can see the Lunar Rover is in front of the cross hairs.

On with the Facts!!!

I tried to find a credible man to get my facts from on this subject, and I found just that. The following information came form Mr. Bill Kaysing, seven years head of technical publications for the Rocketdyne Research Department at the Propulsion Field Laboratory in the Simi Hills, near Kenoga Park (actually, Canoga Park - ed.), California. During this time as head of technical publications for Rocketdyne, Mr. Kaysing had a Top Secret clearance.

Facts about the Moon

An average days temperature on the moon ranges from 260 degrees F to 280 degrees F, too (hot) for film to survive. At those temperatures, film crinkles up into a ball.

About 20 miles about [sic] the Earth, there is a radiation belt named the Van Allen belt. No human can get through this belt, If you try than you get hit with 300+ rads of radiation. Unless they are surrounded on each side by 4 feet on lead.

There are millions of micro-metors [sic] traveling at speeds up to 6000 MPH, which would tear the ship to pieces.

If you look at the pictures/video of people on the moon, you will never see more than 3 stars.

When the LEM set down on the Lunar surface, it gave out 3000 lb. worth of thrust. This would have created a massive hole underneath the Lunar Module, but in pictures of the Lunar Module, the ground underneath is untouched.

But why would they do it?

I have come up with three reasons why NASA would fake a landing on the moon:MONEY. NASA gathered about 30 billion dollars pretending to go to the moon. That means that someone is getting a lot of money in their pockets.

ATTENTION. If you ever saw the movie "Wag the Dog", the president has sexual relations with a 12 year old. This information goes out to the media 1 week before elections. So, to get the publics mind off of the little Girl, the president stages a war with Albania. The moon shots were the same concept. People did not like what was going on with the Vietnam war, so, to get the publics mind off of all the bad things going on in Vietnam, the US faked a moon landing. If you check your dates, we abruptly stopped going to the moon around the same time the Vietnam War Ended.
TO WIN THE SPACE RACE -- Back in the late 60's early 70's, Russia and the US were in a heated battle to see, well, pretty much who was better. Once the US realized that they couldn't send a man to the moon, they couldn't just say, "OK Russia, we give up."
Whether or not you believe we went to the moon or not, I hope that some interesting questions have been brought to your mind through this report.

Frndz 4 ever...

NO 2 INTERNET CENSORSHIP!!!

Save the Internet before it is too late - learn how SOPA and PIPA will hurt you, me, and others :

Today, January 18th, 2011, we are joining 100s of websites to stop SOPA and PIPA. Please read and learn more why you should care about it.

SOPA (Stop online piracy act) and PIPA (protect IP act) are two bills before Congress to censor the contents on the Internet. While we, ourselves at Free Calls Hub, have been hurt by content copy and other similar issues, we do not think that that Congress has the right solution to the problem of Piracy.

We have read the SOPA and PIPA and found that there are things that can hurt us in so many stupid ways.

How can SOPA and PIPA hurt us?

Free Calls Hub is open for comments as we believe that the best way to serve our readers is to listen to their questions and feedbacks on the offers we post. If a reader posts a comment that has content taken from some other website, the other website can file a complain against us and we can get ceased.

"This will mandate bloggers to monitor the entire internet to make sure all the content including comments are not posted elsewhere. This will require hiring a lot of people for monitoring and Lawyers who can answer the notices served under those acts. This, as you can see, will increase a blog's running expenses and will eventually kill the blog."

Congress has done it only because of some selfish lobbyists. Oops we might get under for saying that. However, people like O'Reilly (the book publisher) who suffer from pirated book problems are against SOPA - read what Tim O'Reilly says about SOPA.

What can you do to save Internet?

Hit the (+1) Google+ button to show that you are against SOPA. For every 10 likes we will donate $1 to Progressive Change Campaign Committee (PCCC). Please donate directly to them if you care for the Internet.

Call your member of Congress - get number and the script by PCCC here.

Websites like Google, Reddit, Craigslist, Yahoo, Wikipedia and a lot of your favorite websites have joined against SOPA and PIPA. So should you to save them.

Internet is awesome for one reason - it is open to everyone. If they censored it you would not see any new site being launched because the expense of hiring tech and law needed will only be a prerogative of rich and affluent. Call these Senators to meet with their constituents before January 24th meeting.

Never Give Up

There are reasons to believe in a better world